Science, WorldMagBlog  Click to Print
Include Comments
Vanity Fair visits the Creation Museum
80 CommentsWritten by Scott LambFebruary 1, 2:36 PMVanity Fair, a leading U.S. magazine of
pop culture and fashion, devoted a lengthy article in their February 2010 issue to a review of the
Creation Museum (Answers in Genesis).

To sum it up, the author thinks creationism is for idiots:

Just off a motorway, in a barren and uninspiring piece of scrub, the museum is impressively
incongruous, a righteously modernist building resting in landscaped gardens filled with dinosaur
topiaries. It cost $27 million and was completed in 2007. It answers the famous question about
what God could have done if he had had money. This is it. Oddly, it is a conspicuously and
emphatically secular construction. There is no religious symbolism. No crosses. No stained glass.
No spiral c
ampanile. It has borrowed the empirical vernacular of the enemy to wrap the literal interpretation
of Genesis in the façade of a liberal art gallery or library. It is the Lamb dressed in wolf’s clothing.

The next things I noticed were the very illiberally accoutred security guards. They are absurdly
over-armed, overdressed, and overweight. Perhaps the museum is concerned that armed
radical atheists, maddened by the voices of reason in their confused heads, will storm in
waving the periodic table, screaming, “I think, therefore I am!”

The Creation Museum isn’t really a museum at all. It’s an argument. It’s not even an argument.
It’s the ammunition for an argument. It is the Word made into bullets. An armory of righteous
revisionism. This whole building is devoted to the literal veracity of the first 11 chapters of Genesis:
God created the world in six days, and the whole thing is no more than 6,000 years old. Everything
came at once, so Tyrannosaurus rex and Noah shared a cabin. That’s an awful lot of explaining to do.
This place doesn’t just take on evolution—it squares off with geology, anthropology, paleontology,
history, chemistry, astronomy, zoology, biology, and good taste. It directly and boldly contradicts
most -onomies and all -ologies, including most theology. (emphasis mine)


What the author finds so shocking — that a Christian worldview carries implications for all those
“-onomies” and “-ologies” — is simply a basic understanding that all truth is God’s truth, and that
everything in the created world falls under the sovereign rule of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Note: Due to the lack of modesty in fashion, Christian discretion is advised when clicking through to
Vanity Fair.


RaynaRenee