http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl? http://www.eblah.com en http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1271124474/ http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1271124474/#num1 "God is love".  I do not serve a God that destroys people but loves them instead.
Well, I have looked up several times in the scriptures that God has passed judgment on nations and
people, and they were destroyed because of their refusal to repent

Starting with Noah and the flood.
The judgments of many nations in the scriptures that were so wicked that God destroyed them.
The nations that God drove out of the land of Canaan because they were so wicked.  
""but for the wickedness of these nations the Lord doeth drive them out before Thee."
Deutronomy 9: 5
Pharoah
Saul died because of his disobedience to God.
Ahab and Jezebel
The Assyrian nation
The Sons of Eli
Babylon
Edom
Ammonites
Israel
Judah
Jerusalem
City of Tyre
Caperneum

But now God has offered forgiveness to all that believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.  He justifies
the ungodly that believe.  

But those that refuse the offer of God's forgiveness in Jesus, will receive God's judgement
just as the wicked before them, because they refuse to believe.

RaynaRenee]]> Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:07:54 RaynaRenee http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1265948526/ http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1265948526/#num1 It was on FOX News, and is on Sermona Audio breaking news.
***********************

2 Street Preachers Shot to Death in Florida
Sunday, February 07, 2010  

BOYNTON BEACH, Fla. —  Two men ministering on the streets of Boynton Beach were allegedly gunned
down by an 18-year-old man.

Police say 24-year-old Tite Sufra and 23-year-old Stephen Ocean were preaching to Jeriah Woody for
about 15 minutes, until he got a phone call.

Woody left, but then allegedly started walking toward the two. When Sufra approached, Woody
allegedly shot him in the head. Ocean ran, and police say Woody shot him in the back, then
walked up and shot him again — this time in the head at point-blank range.

Police said a witness identified Woody, who is known by the street name "Plug." He surrendered
Wednesday on two counts of first-degree murder charges.

It could not be determined if Woody had an attorney.

RaynaRenee]]> Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:22:06 RaynaRenee http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1264812011/ http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1264812011/#num1
RaynaRenee]]> Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:40:11 RaynaRenee http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1221359343/ http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1221359343/#num1
I know the RCC believes that the priest in their church has the power to change the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ, so that all that partake of it actually partake of Christ's literal body and blood.

I have read where Lutherans believe that the bread and wine remain the same, but somehow they also are changed into the body and blood of Christ.

Also, many churches believe that the communion service is done in remembrance alone of Jesus great sacrifice of Himself that was given for His people that they will always remember Him, not forget Him, and the great price that was paid for their souls.  Not only that they are to search their hearts, confess theirr sins to God alone,  before coming to communion that they may not partake unworthily.  The bread and wine continue to remain the bread and wine only as symbols of the great sacrifice of Jesus. "As oft as do this, do it in rememberance of me."

"The flesh profiiteth nothing, the words I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life".

Anyway, what does the Free Presbyterian church believe, or what does anyone else believe.?

Thank you
Rayna

]]> Sun, 14 Sep 2008 03:29:03 RaynaRenee http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1202567764/ http://www.reformationireland.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1202567764/#num1 Archbishop was talking nonsense on sharia law
Irish Independent
Saturday February 09 2008  
THERE are good ideas and bad ideas and truly awful ideas. And no, I don't mean Donie Cassidy's suggestion that we
should drive on the right-hand side of the road for the convenience of tourists while the same tourists have to observe
a different speed-limit. I mean the Archbishop of Canterbury's belief that "aspects" of the Muslim sharia law should and
will be introduced into Britain.
In fairness to Rowan Williams, he doesn't want to bring in stoning to death for adultery or chopping off hands for theft.
He is talking about things like divorce settlements.
But he is hopelessly wrong. Normally a chorus of condemnation tempts me to take the side of the person being pilloried.
This time, however, the victim deserves every stinging comment, every slight on his intelligence and common sense.
He cannot have given any thought to the consequences of his remarks. They made themselves felt as soon as the words
were out of his mouth. They delighted extreme Muslims, who would like to go much further and impose their laws on
everybody else. And they comforted the wildest opponents of multi-culturalism, who can now present them as the thin
end of a wedge. So far from easing community relations in Britain, they will do enormous damage.
Dr Williams is a liberal. On this side of the water, we are more accustomed to seeing feet in conservative clerical mouths.
Intriguing that churchmen of both kinds misunderstand so much about law, history and society.
In Europe, not all that long ago, church and state were pretty much the same thing. Henry VIII thought so. He made
himself supreme head of the Church of England. If you stayed loyal to the Pope or liked the teachings of Martin Luther,
he might have you burned alive. A Papist and a Protestant might be dragged to their horrible deaths on the same hurdle.
The 18th-century Enlightenment put an end to all that. Not everywhere, though. Not in the Papal states. Not in Ireland where,
less than two centuries ago, British laws penalised the majority Catholic population. When we became independent,
we rejected the notion of a state religion. But the leaders of the once-persecuted Catholic Church wanted to behave
like pre-Enlightenment, pre-Reformation princes.
Right down to the 21st century, in addition to the laws of our own State another law was imposed on most of us,
the Roman canon law. Politicians cringed when bishops waved their croziers. The most cunning among them thought
they had pulled a masterstroke when they opposed contraception, divorce and abortion.
They failed to realise that the war had been lost before they ever engaged in any of those battles. Long before the
Liberal Agenda controversies, long before the sex abuse scandals, as far back as the 1960s, the contraception revolt
fatally undermined the authority and credibility of the Church.
Nevertheless, it took a very long time to force the clergy to forfeit the privileges they had enjoyed, openly or secretly,
for generations. Not until the 21st century did a justice minister assert bluntly that canon law cannot prevail over the
law of the land. This was Michael McDowell, more skilful as a lawyer than as a politician.
In Britain, meanwhile, they held on to their monarchy and their Established Church. But the more enlightened bishops
found their position embarrassing as well as anomalous. They had other embarrassments: schisms and threatened
schisms over gay clergy and women priests. They were divided on lines rather similar to those in Ireland, but they did not
really have the Irish choice, to retreat into authoritarianism. They dashed to the liberal side. On the way there,
Archbishop Williams lost the run of himself.
Authoritarianism is out of date, but his particular version of liberalism is wholly misguided and out of touch, as far out
of touch as the antiquated views of Cardinal Desmond Connell.
First, you cannot have one law for Muslims (or Catholics or Protestants or Jews) and another for everybody else.
We live in a secular society. And in any case the courts -- Irish, British or European -- would never tolerate it.
Secondly, Dr Williams ought to know that there is a world of difference between Hasnat Khan, eminent surgeon and one-time
lover of Princess Diana, and an illiterate Bangladeshi girl, who probably cannot even speak English, in an arranged marriage.
What faint chance she has of asserting her rights depends on the English law and the English courts.
And that brings me to a point far more important than doomed efforts to return to an earlier age, or to open the door to
new and deplorable forms of discrimination.
If immigrant communities in a developed country want to retain their language, customs, ceremonies -- in short, their culture --
good luck to them. But what they need most, and what the host societies need most, is assimilation. The Paris riots, and the
shocking discovery that young Muslims brought up in Britain had engaged in suicide bombings, marked dreadful failures of
assimilation. Will Ireland learn from the mistakes of other countries? The signs are not good. We already have all-black schools.
Roy Hattersley, one of the most considerable British Labour politicians of his generation, represented a Birmingham consituency
populated by immigrants. He said that "a little black boy in Harlem thinks he can be president of the United States.
A little black boy in my constituency knows he will never be Lord Chancellor."
The Harlem boy was only a little ahead of his time, but the chances of his black or Muslim counterpart in 21st-century
Britain, or Ireland, will depend on whether society takes integration seriously.

]]> Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:36:04 Joseph Lowe